Greetings,
Today we're checking out one
of Moondrop's more recent releases, the Starfield.
Moondrop is a Chinese
company out of Chengdu and has rapidly risen to fame within the
audiophile community. They are known for earphones and earbuds that
follow the Harman tuning curve, but with a spin here and there to
give each product a unique sound, at an affordable price and with
stellar build quality and interesting designs. My time with the
Starfield has showed these qualities to ring true, and I have been
seriously impressed with the performance on tap from a product
costing just over 100 USD.
The most apparent change
I've noticed as you move up in price is not necessarily the frequency
response curve, but overall refinement and technical capability. As
earphones get more expensive (and this is not a set rule because
there are definitely exceptions) they get smoother and more mature
sounding without making sacrifices to achieve those qualities.
Imaging, layering, and separation all improve, giving off a more
natural presentation. That was something that I adored about the
Brainwavz B400, and why it's still one of my favorite iems to this
day. It's staging is simply a step above everything else I've heard
in the price range, and more in line with the performance you get
from much more expensive gear. The same can be said for the Starfield
which to me is all the more surprising and impressive because it does
it with a single dynamic driver, not four balanced armatures ala.
B400.
The Starfield is a fantastic
product worth your attention, and this is why.
What I Hear Treble
is decently well extended with a comfortable level of upper treble
emphasis. Cymbals, chimes, etc. are not overly present giving the
Starfield's presentation some sparkle and satisfying air between
notes. It manages to be neither tiring nor dull, and for my
preferences hits an elusive mark of a near perfect balance of
technical competence and entertainment value. Lower treble is
slightly elevated giving the Starfield's presentation plenty of
detail without being overly analytic. This further feeds in why this
earphone is so enjoyable over long term listening sessions. Even at
listening volumes I'm not comfortable with, it remains shockingly
fatigue free. The 10mm carbon nanotube driver the Starfueld is
equipped with is reasonably quick too, with a fairly accurate attack
and decay.
The
Starfield's midrange is less recessed than other iems that chase the
Harman curve, which I was very glad to hear. It's still a u-shaped
tune, but not excessively so. Vocals and instruments are
well-weighted, leaning ever so slightly towards a lighter style that
helps improve clarity. Upper and lower mid balance is very even and
linear with neither range showing a significant boost in presence.
Upper mids are slightly more prominent, but not enough to warrant
more than a passing remark. It doesn't lead to a shouty or overly
aggressive presentation whatsoever. Timbre is outstanding and a step
above most other products I've heard in recent memory. Picking apart
varied instruments in a busy ensemble is fairly effortless with only
various multi-driver or mega-buck iems competing. Few single dynamics
I've heard sound quite as accurate.
Bass
on the Starfield in conservatively elevated with a moderate density
and weight. The presentation is quite linear her too, from upper bass
to lower where it starts to roll off, thereby reducing emphasis on
the lowest of notes. There is still plenty of air being moved though,
and the Starfield can certainly satisfy with notes that are meant to
be felt more than heard. Mid-bass is reasonably quick and displays a
decent level of punch. On occasion it comes across a tad soft and
lacking impact. Texture and detail are excellent with grungy bass
notes being accurately reproduced. Nothing feels overly smoothed and
certainly not one-note. It's a typically dynamic sounding low end.
The
Starfield's sound stage is greater in width than depth with the
ability to toss effects past the sides of your head and well off into
the distance. Imaging is especially impressive and nuanced with fine
channel-to-channel movements being exceptionally clear and obvious.
Off hand, the only sub-200 USD earphone I can think of that bests it
is the Brainwavz B400. The larger than average staging helps give the
Starfield a very layered presentation with live recordings displaying
clear depth between instruments. It also works well with gaming
letting you judge distance fairly accurately in racing and combat
titles. Instrument separation is also above average and only at
extremely high volumes did I ever find tracks becoming congested or
muddied, something that in my experience is fairly common to single
dynamic earphones.
To put
it simply, the Starfield is easily one of the best sounding single
dynamic earphones I've heard, regardless of price. The mildly
u-shaped tune gives it impressive versatility across genres while
remaining technically impressive in terms of clarity and sound stage.
Like my other favorite sub-200 USD earphone, the Brainwavz B400, the
Starfield is always entertaining and never fails to put a smile on my
face. It's good for long listening sessions, and can even be used to
analyze tracks if you want, though there are others that better it in
this regard. It has a true jack-of-all-trades tune that doesn't
really sacrifice much of anything to get there.
Select Comparisons
(volumes matched with Dayton Audio iMM-6)
KB
EAR Diamond (79.00 USD): Bass on
the Diamond is slower, digs deeper (Starfield seems to roll off
slightly), and is more prominent, but the sheer presence of the
midbass overwhelm. Bass out of the Diamond lacks the texture and
nuance of the Starfield. Starfield also has more punch and authority
to notes. The Starfield's midrange is more forward and more even in
terms of upper and lower balance so male and female vocals sound more
evenly represented. Timbre is similarly good with the Starfield
having a very slight edge. Treble out of the Starfield is more
detailed and better controlled (i.e splash free) though the
brilliance region could use a boost to put it more in line with the
Diamond's presentation. The Diamond's sound stage lacks the width of
the Starfield's, but isn't too far off in terms of depth. Imaging,
layering, and separation are all in Moondrop's backyard though, all
of which are some of the best I've experienced in a sub-200 USD
earphone.
The Starfield's improved detail and technical ability combined with a
more balanced signature (still u-shaped though) has me picking it up
over the Diamond every time.
In terms of build, the Starfield has a much neater, more interesting
paint job and imo is one of the coolest looking iems around. Fit of
the component parts goes to the Diamond though, since seams on the
Starfield are much more noticeable. Comfort and isolation are just
very slightly better with the Starfield for me, with foam tips making
it pretty much a wash. When it comes to the cable, as much as I love
the Diamond's I am a huge fan of thin and light braided cables. The
Starfield's certainly lacks the durability factor but it stays out of
the way and I quite enjoy it. Most will probably prefer the Diamond's
cable though.
TinHiFi
T4 (79.00-119.00 USD): Bass on
the Starfield is a little heavier and warmer with similar extension.
The T4 is more textured and faster handling rapid notes even better,
but like the Starfield can lack impact at times. The T4's midrange is
more forward with more upper mid emphasis. It has a cooler tonality
and less accurate timbre as a result. Clarity and detail are similar
with the T4 having a very slight edge. While neither earphone adds
sibilance to a track, it's more prominent through the T4. Overall a
much less forgiving midrange than the Starfields is. Treble out of
the T4 is more prominent from lower to upper giving it's presentation
extra energy and sparkle. Attack and decay are snappier than they are
out of the Starfield giving it a more analytic feel. Sound stage is
pretty even between the two with the Starfield's less forward mids
giving the impression of a more distant and rounded stage. The T4 can
toss effects further away despite a more intimate starting point.
Imaging is notably more nuanced out of the Starfield while both
provide excellent layering and separation.
I'll give the Starfield a slight edge in overall sound quality due to
the T4's mediocre imaging, but otherwise they trade blow for blow and
are both outstanding earphones. Go with the T4 if you like a more
neutral leaning sound, and the Starfield if you prefer some extra low
end and general warmth.
In terms of build, both are great. The T4's design isn't as eye
catching but fit and finish is better, and since it features bare
metal, you won't have to worry about paint chips as seems to be an
issue for some with the Starfield. While I like MMCX connectors, the
T4's have too much play and feel nowhere near as secure as the
Starfield's excellent recessed 0.78mm 2-pin ports. The Starfield's
cable is also nicer. While the T4's cable is thicker and has a nice
chin cinch, it's also quite bouncy and sticky. The Starfield's cable
is light and lean and rarely gets in the way. Both have well-design
preformed ear guides.
Brainwavz
B400 (169.50 USD): The
quad-armature B400 has been my sub-200 USD benchmark for a couple
years now, and while the Starfield doesn't quite unseat it, the fact
they're even being compared should give you an idea of how much I
respect the Starfield and its performance.
When it comes to bass, performance is unexpectedly close but favours
the Starfield with it's dynamic drivers. Notes hit with greater
impact and it moves more air thank to improved extension and more
sub-bass presence. They start the process of rolling off around the
same time though. In favour of the B400 is texture and speed. The
B400's midrange is notably more forward and intimate with more detail
and similar clarity. Vocals have a bit more meat to them which really
benefits female voices. Timbre on the B400 is great, but the
Starfield sounds just a bit more natural, most noticeable to me with
pianos. Treble on both earphones is quite relaxed with the B400
sounding more lively in the upper treble region. Once again, detail
and clarity reside in the B400's camp, but the differences are fairly
minor. While the B400's sound stage is clearly the smaller and more
intimate of the two, its multi-driver setup gives it a clear edge in
layering and separation. Imaging on both is also well above-average
in my opinion, with the B400 giving listeners even more precise
movement and depth to it's presentation.
I absolutely adore both of these products and could easily live with
either as my only earphone. They're that good. In the Starfield's
favour, its more relaxed mid-range and deeper bass gives it a more
chill vibe, whereas the more mid-forward B400 demands your attention.
I still favour the B400's presentation, but I'd be 100% content with
either. Given the price difference and the B400's sub-par build
quality, that is a win for the Starfield.
In terms of build, no contest. The Starfield's painted steel shells
are miles ahead of the B400's 3D-printed shells in everything but
comfort and isolation. Moondrop also equipped the Starfield with a
nicer cable, though one that likely won't be quite as durable as the
more heavy duty one that Brainwavz provides.
In The Ear The
Starfield is a gorgeous looking earphone with an organic, low profile
design. Fit of the component parts is good, but there is a prominent
seam circling the base of the face plate that may or may not bother
some. The ports for the removable cable are recessed a couple
millimetres into the housing offering a snug fit for the plugs and
enhanced protection from accidents and careless owners that shove the
earphone in their pocket. Unlike most other products in the Moondrop
range, the Starfield is painted an eye-catching metallic blue with
the Starfield name on the right earpiece, and a compass on the left.
Personally, I think they're one of the best looking products on the
market and are oozing style. It's certainly a breath of fresh air
from the bare metal, or chrome, or black earphones that are oh so
common. Keep in mind though that this paint job doesn't seem to be
the most durable thing in the world with numerous examples of them
being chipped floating around the web. As long as you're not slinging
the Starfield around your neck when not in use, letting the earpieces
clack together while you walk, or stuffing them in your pocket
without first being set within the case or some other protective
carrying device, you should be okay.
The
cable Moondrop includes with the Starfield is going to be a divisive
one in my opinion. There are those that like a thin, lightweight
cable, of which the Starfield's is. Strain relief is good at the 90
degree angled jack, but lacking entirely at the chunky metal y-split.
Leading up to the earphones are preformed ear guides which again,
some like, some detest. The plugs themselves continue the lightweight
theme and are small and unobtrusive. For me personally, I love this
cable. The blue colouring matches the rest of the product, the low
mass keeps it from tugging at your ears when running or doing
anything more vigorous than a walk, and it doesn't seem to catch on
your environment often. It's like a slightly beefier, cheaper feeling
version of the EarNiNE EN2J's cable. On the other hand, the braid
kinda loose (though not as bad as the TinHifi P1's), and the lack of
strain relief at the y-split is somewhat concerning for overall
longevity. For something that is as nice to actually use as this
cable is, I can accept the negatives in place, even if they don't
have to be there.
So the
Starfield is pretty well built, looks good, and the cable is decent.
How is it to actually wear? For me, fantastic! Despite the weight of
the dense metal shells, the Starfield's ergonomics are outstanding.
The low profile design keeps weight distribution fairly even around
your outer ear, and while it has a fairly shallow fit, there is never
the feeling of a compromised seal. Isolation unfortunately is not
amazing. I don't find this entirely surprising given the shallow fit
and twin vents on the inside of each earpiece. Of course, foam tips
help mitigate this sound leak somewhat, but not enough to make the
Starfield an ideal pick for routine use in noisy areas like a coffee
shop or on transit.
In The Box Moondrop
equipped the Starfield with some classy packaging. The outer sleeve
is beautifully designed with a number of neat touches. The brand is
known for prominently featuring Anime girls on their boxes, and while
one appears here she is merely a silhouette set against a starry
night sky. In the sky is the Starfield name and the statement “Listen
to the Sound of Stars”, surrounded by two lines that mimic the
upper and lower edges of the left earpiece. This sort of attention to
detail goes a long way in setting Moondrop apart from the competition
in my eyes, as I'm someone that truly appreciates when a brand puts
effort into their packaging. Out back of the sleeve is an image of
the Starfield's right earpiece, but deconstructed to show off the
component parts. Slipping off the sleeve reveals a blue box printed
with the Moondrop logo in silver foil lettering. The speckled
texturing of the box reminds me of what Campfire Audio does with
their cardboard, though here it is much more subtle.
Removing
the lid you find the blue specking continues. The top half of the
interior is dominated by a cardboard covered foam insert in which the
Starfield's earpieces are set. Starfield in silver foil lettering
resides just below the earphones. Lifting out this insert reveals a
covered compartment where some extra accessories along with the
manual, contact info, and QA cards are stored. Backing up a bit, the
rest of the package contains a compact clam shell case in which the
rest of the accessories can be found. In all you get:
- Starfield earphones
- 0.78mm 2-pin 24AWG Litz 4N OFC 1.2M cable
- Carrying case
- Tweezers
- 3 spare pairs of metal nozzle filters
- Single flange silicone tips (s/m/l x2)
This is
a very simple but enriching unboxing experience. Outside of the
sleeve being tough to remove initially, the rest of the experience is
fuss free. The design is attractive and well thought out, as is the
accessory kit. The clam shell case is smaller in circumference than
most, but has enough depth to comfortably hold the earphones and
spare tips while still fitting in most pockets. It has a pleasing
texture too thanks to the grippy, knobbled surface. The tweezers and
spare filters are something you usually only get with vastly more
expensive products and were a welcome surprise. Lastly, the included
tips are top quality and use a grippy, soft silicone that reliably
seals and causes zero discomfort. Some more tip variety would have
been welcome though.
Final Thoughts It
continues to be an amazing time for fans of portable audio. It's hard
to find a bad sounding earphone. Everything from super cheap budget
gear to high end earphones is usually at the very least competent, if
not very good. Unfortunately, that also means that it takes something
seriously impressive to stand out. The Starfield is one of those rare
products.
The
Starfield pops visually. It performs at a level that was unimaginable
for a product around 100 USD a few years back. The build quality is
good. The packaging is nice. The accessory kit isn't full of cheap,
throwaway extras, like a case that you can pick up on Aliexpress for
50 cents. The overall presentation and performance is a step above
most of the competition. Moondrop aimed high with the Starfield, and
absolutely nailed it. If you're looking to buy an earphone for under
200 USD right now, take a long hard look at the Starfield. I have a
feeling this one is going to remain a strong contender for quite a
while.
Thanks
for reading!
- B9
(Originally posted to https://thecontraptionist.blog)
Disclaimer Thanks
to Nappoler with Hifigo.com for arranging a sample of the Starfield
for the purposes of review. The thoughts within this review are my
own subjective opinions and are not representative of Moondrop,
Hifigo, or any other entity. At the time of writing the Starfield
retailed for 109.00 USD:
https://hifigo.com/products/moondrop-starfield-carbon-nanotube-diaphragm-dynamic-earphone
/ www.aliexpress.com/item/4000644906074.html
Specifications
- Driver: 10mm Carbon Nanotube dual cavity dynamic driver with Japanese Daikoku CCAW voice coils
- Impedance: 32멱15% (@1khz)
- Sensitivity: 122dB/Vrms(@1khz)
- Frequency Response: 10Hz-36,000 Hz
- Cable: 0.78mm 2-pin 24AWG Litz 4N OFC 1.2M
Devices Used For Testing
LG G6, LG Q70, XDuoo Link, Asus
FX53V, TEAC HA-501, Periodic Audio Nickle, Shanling M0, Hifiman
MegaMini
Some Test Tunes
Supertramp
– Crime of the Century
Slipknot
– Vol 3 (The Subliminal Verses)
Daft
Punk – Random Access Memories
Aesop
Rock – The Impossible Kid
King
Crimson – Lark's Tongues in Aspic
King
Crimson – Starless and Bible Black
Infected
Mushroom – Legend of the Black Shawarma
The
Prodigy – The Day is My Enemy
Steely
Dan – The Royal Scam
Porcupine
Tree – Stupid Dreams
Post a Comment